Arkoma Resources vs Mustang Fuel

Side-by-side comparison of two oil and gas operators in OK and OK,TX. Drawn from public well data and state-regulator production filings.

Important — Public-Data Disclaimer. The information shown on this page is sourced exclusively from publicly available oil and gas regulatory records (Texas Railroad Commission, Oklahoma Corporation Commission, and aggregated public well data). Valor is presenting these public records side-by-side as an informational convenience only.

Arkoma Resources

OK · 739 wells on file

Mustang Fuel

OK,TX · 998 wells on file

Side-by-Side Statistics

MetricArkoma ResourcesMustang Fuel
Total wells739998
Wells producing (any time)635671
Permits filed (last 24 months)00
Most recent permit date2023-08-152019-06-04
Most recent spud date2021-11-052022-02-18
Average lateral length (ft)1,9863,422
Top formationWoodford-CaneyRed Fork
Top countyPittsburgPittsburg
States operating inOKOK,TX
Last-12mo oil production (BBL)16924,013
Last-12mo gas production (Mcf)52,3525,394,414

Shared Territory

Both operators have wells in these counties:

PittsburgHaskell

Both operators target these formations / plays:

Woodford-Caney

Per-Operator Top Counties & Formations

Arkoma Resources

Counties: Pittsburg (256) · Mc Intosh (167) · Okmulgee (101) · Hughes (68) · Haskell (36)

Formations: Woodford-Caney (367) · Harthsorne (97) · Atoka (46) · Dutcher (36) · Booch (34)

Mustang Fuel

Counties: Pittsburg (217) · Roger Mills (172) · Blaine (82) · Latimer (71) · Haskell (71)

Formations: Red Fork (146) · Granite Wash (108) · Woodford-Caney (99) · Woodford (89) · Arkoma Basin (82)

Related Comparisons

About This Comparison