Barrett Resources vs Huber J M

Side-by-side comparison of two oil and gas operators in AR,CO,KS,LA,MT,ND,OK,TX,UT,WY and AL,AR,IL,KS,MI,MT,OK,TX,WY. Drawn from public well data and state-regulator production filings.

Important — Public-Data Disclaimer. The information shown on this page is sourced exclusively from publicly available oil and gas regulatory records (Texas Railroad Commission, Oklahoma Corporation Commission, and aggregated public well data). Valor is presenting these public records side-by-side as an informational convenience only.

Barrett Resources

AR,CO,KS,LA,MT,ND,OK,TX,UT,WY · 1,893 wells on file

Huber J M

AL,AR,IL,KS,MI,MT,OK,TX,WY · 3,447 wells on file

Side-by-Side Statistics

MetricBarrett ResourcesHuber J M
Total wells1,8933,447
Wells producing (any time)1,4101,770
Permits filed (last 24 months)00
Most recent permit date2013-01-142017-08-09
Most recent spud date2005-08-012010-09-27
Average lateral length (ft)293671
Top formationNiobrara- MowryNiobrara
Top countyCampbellSheridan
States operating inAR,CO,KS,LA,MT,ND,OK,TX,UT,WYAL,AR,IL,KS,MI,MT,OK,TX,WY
Last-12mo oil production (BBL)00
Last-12mo gas production (Mcf)2,3080

Shared Territory

Both operators have wells in these counties:

CampbellJohnson

Both operators target these formations / plays:

NiobraraPowder River BasinMowry

Per-Operator Top Counties & Formations

Barrett Resources

Counties: Campbell (1,566) · Garfield (58) · Carbon (36) · Natrona (28) · Johnson (27)

Formations: Niobrara- Mowry (1,305) · Niobrara (151) · Mesaverde (62) · Powder River Basin (48) · Mowry (35)

Huber J M

Counties: Sheridan (2,202) · Campbell (717) · Hutchinson (132) · Johnson (48) · Carson (27)

Formations: Niobrara (728) · Powder River Basin (676) · Mowry (577) · Granite Wash (137) · Monarch (105)

Related Comparisons

About This Comparison