Be Anadarko Ii LLC vs Mmgl Txph LLC

Side-by-side comparison of two oil and gas operators in OK,TX and TX. Drawn from public well data and state-regulator production filings.

Important — Public-Data Disclaimer. The information shown on this page is sourced exclusively from publicly available oil and gas regulatory records (Texas Railroad Commission, Oklahoma Corporation Commission, and aggregated public well data). Valor is presenting these public records side-by-side as an informational convenience only.

Be Anadarko Ii LLC

OK,TX · 805 wells on file

Mmgl Txph LLC

TX · 1,488 wells on file

Side-by-Side Statistics

MetricBe Anadarko Ii LLCMmgl Txph LLC
Total wells8051,488
Wells producing (any time)7921,459
Permits filed (last 24 months)210
Most recent permit date2025-12-122025-12-05
Most recent spud date2025-12-162022-01-21
Average lateral length (ft)4,0514,290
Top formationClevelandGranite Wash
Top countyLipscombHemphill
States operating inOK,TXTX
Last-12mo oil production (BBL)136,611102,412
Last-12mo gas production (Mcf)2,497,2815,814,089

Shared Territory

Both operators have wells in these counties:

HemphillRobertsOchiltree

Both operators target these formations / plays:

ClevelandGranite WashThirty-One Carbonate-Chert

Per-Operator Top Counties & Formations

Be Anadarko Ii LLC

Counties: Lipscomb (413) · Ellis (168) · Hemphill (80) · Roberts (60) · Ochiltree (41)

Formations: Cleveland (491) · Granite Wash (169) · Cleveland (109) · Thirty-One Carbonate-Chert (23) · Morrow (2)

Mmgl Txph LLC

Counties: Hemphill (916) · Wheeler (265) · Roberts (265) · Hansford (33) · Ochiltree (3)

Formations: Granite Wash (1,451) · Cleveland (24) · Pennsylvanian (5) · Granite Wash (3) · Thirty-One Carbonate-Chert (2)

Related Comparisons

About This Comparison