Cimarex Energy Company vs Noble Energy

Side-by-side comparison of two oil and gas operators in OK,TX. Drawn from public well data and state-regulator production filings.

Important — Public-Data Disclaimer. The information shown on this page is sourced exclusively from publicly available oil and gas regulatory records (Texas Railroad Commission, Oklahoma Corporation Commission, and aggregated public well data). Valor is presenting these public records side-by-side as an informational convenience only.

Cimarex Energy Company

OK,TX · 1,430 wells on file

Noble Energy

OK,TX · 1,420 wells on file

Side-by-Side Statistics

MetricCimarex Energy CompanyNoble Energy
Total wells1,4301,420
Wells producing (any time)478755
Permits filed (last 24 months)19513
Most recent permit date2025-12-302025-09-26
Most recent spud date2026-04-172024-08-30
Average lateral length (ft)6,0666,244
Top formationSouth Oklahoma Folded BeltAvalon-Bone Spring
Top countyCulbersonReeves
States operating inOK,TXOK,TX
Last-12mo oil production (BBL)173,7061,675,034
Last-12mo gas production (Mcf)1,625,4945,623,389

Shared Territory

Both operators have wells in these counties:

ReevesHemphill

Both operators target these formations / plays:

Avalon-Bone SpringSouth Oklahoma Folded BeltGranite Wash

Per-Operator Top Counties & Formations

Cimarex Energy Company

Counties: Culberson (368) · Garvin (194) · Reeves (152) · Marshall (123) · Hemphill (52)

Formations: South Oklahoma Folded Belt (243) · Wolfcamp (204) · Avalon-Bone Spring (192) · Woodford (149) · Granite Wash (110)

Noble Energy

Counties: Reeves (591) · Stephens (198) · Tulsa (62) · Carter (51) · Hemphill (46)

Formations: Avalon-Bone Spring (508) · South Oklahoma Folded Belt (201) · Chautauqua Platform (66) · Granite Wash (56) · Excello-Mulky (54)

Related Comparisons

About This Comparison