Cimarex Energy Company vs Wpx Energy

Side-by-side comparison of two oil and gas operators in AL,CA,KS,LA,MI,MS,MT,ND,NM,OK,TX,UT,WY and CO,KS,ND,NM,OK,PA,TX,UT,WY. Drawn from public well data and state-regulator production filings.

Important — Public-Data Disclaimer. The information shown on this page is sourced exclusively from publicly available oil and gas regulatory records (Texas Railroad Commission, Oklahoma Corporation Commission, and aggregated public well data). Valor is presenting these public records side-by-side as an informational convenience only.

Cimarex Energy Company

AL,CA,KS,LA,MI,MS,MT,ND,NM,OK,TX,UT,WY · 2,508 wells on file

Wpx Energy

CO,KS,ND,NM,OK,PA,TX,UT,WY · 2,819 wells on file

Side-by-Side Statistics

MetricCimarex Energy CompanyWpx Energy
Total wells2,5082,819
Wells producing (any time)9501,762
Permits filed (last 24 months)149131
Most recent permit date2026-04-012026-06-26
Most recent spud date2026-04-292026-05-08
Average lateral length (ft)5,1677,536
Top formationAvalon-Bone SpringAvalon-Bone Spring
Top countyEddyLoving
States operating inAL,CA,KS,LA,MI,MS,MT,ND,NM,OK,TX,UT,WYCO,KS,ND,NM,OK,PA,TX,UT,WY
Last-12mo oil production (BBL)11,832,38126,616,334
Last-12mo gas production (Mcf)117,299,830156,869,211

Shared Territory

Both operators have wells in these counties:

Eddy

Both operators target these formations / plays:

Avalon-Bone SpringWolfcamp

Per-Operator Top Counties & Formations

Cimarex Energy Company

Counties: Eddy (497) · Lea (392) · Culberson (329) · Garvin (194) · Reeves (149)

Formations: Avalon-Bone Spring (694) · Morrow (327) · South Oklahoma Folded Belt (243) · Wolfcamp (191) · Woodford (149)

Wpx Energy

Counties: Loving (992) · Eddy (584) · Winkler (206) · Rio Arriba (132) · Ward (123)

Formations: Avalon-Bone Spring (1,458) · Wolfcamp (148) · Bakken (94) · Arkoma Basin (90) · Dakota (71)

Related Comparisons

About This Comparison