Conocophillips Company vs Mack Energy Company

Side-by-side comparison of two oil and gas operators in OK,TX. Drawn from public well data and state-regulator production filings.

Important — Public-Data Disclaimer. The information shown on this page is sourced exclusively from publicly available oil and gas regulatory records (Texas Railroad Commission, Oklahoma Corporation Commission, and aggregated public well data). Valor is presenting these public records side-by-side as an informational convenience only.

Conocophillips Company

OK,TX · 5,774 wells on file

Mack Energy Company

OK,TX · 1,534 wells on file

Side-by-Side Statistics

MetricConocophillips CompanyMack Energy Company
Total wells5,7741,534
Wells producing (any time)1,972649
Permits filed (last 24 months)880
Most recent permit date2026-01-162024-03-29
Most recent spud date2026-03-062024-10-17
Average lateral length (ft)5,618809
Top formationAnadarko BasinWoodford
Top countyWebbCarter
States operating inOK,TXOK,TX
Last-12mo oil production (BBL)2,440,103145,836
Last-12mo gas production (Mcf)25,678,858308,530

Shared Territory

Both operators have wells in these counties:

Stephens

Both operators target these formations / plays:

South Oklahoma Folded BeltAnadarko BasinChautauqua Platform

Per-Operator Top Counties & Formations

Conocophillips Company

Counties: Webb (546) · Howard (535) · Texas (399) · Stephens (376) · Garvin (267)

Formations: Anadarko Basin (653) · South Oklahoma Folded Belt (576) · Wilcox Lobo (494) · Chautauqua Platform (444) · Permian Basin (346)

Mack Energy Company

Counties: Carter (461) · Grady (424) · Stephens (319) · Grant (41) · Alfalfa (40)

Formations: Woodford (819) · South Oklahoma Folded Belt (224) · Anadarko Basin (188) · Morrow (87) · Chautauqua Platform (65)

Related Comparisons

About This Comparison