Cross Timbers Energy vs Juno Operating Company Ii

Side-by-side comparison of two oil and gas operators in OK,TX. Drawn from public well data and state-regulator production filings.

Important — Public-Data Disclaimer. The information shown on this page is sourced exclusively from publicly available oil and gas regulatory records (Texas Railroad Commission, Oklahoma Corporation Commission, and aggregated public well data). Valor is presenting these public records side-by-side as an informational convenience only.

Cross Timbers Energy

OK,TX · 1,423 wells on file

Juno Operating Company Ii

OK,TX · 774 wells on file

Side-by-Side Statistics

MetricCross Timbers EnergyJuno Operating Company Ii
Total wells1,423774
Wells producing (any time)1,233448
Permits filed (last 24 months)40
Most recent permit date2025-03-212023-04-17
Most recent spud date2024-01-052024-01-19
Average lateral length (ft)1,679581
Top formationThirty-One Carbonate-ChertClear Fork
Top countyEctorCrosby
States operating inOK,TXOK,TX
Last-12mo oil production (BBL)109,29230,020
Last-12mo gas production (Mcf)36,1530

Shared Territory

Both operators have wells in these counties:

Lubbock

Both operators target these formations / plays:

Thirty-One Carbonate-ChertPermian BasinClear Fork

Per-Operator Top Counties & Formations

Cross Timbers Energy

Counties: Ector (361) · Cochran (303) · Hockley (196) · Lubbock (140) · Terry (114)

Formations: Thirty-One Carbonate-Chert (359) · Permian Basin (314) · San Andres (231) · Clear Fork (74) · Anadarko Basin (60)

Juno Operating Company Ii

Counties: Crosby (640) · Winkler (59) · Creek (45) · Lubbock (27) · Lincoln (3)

Formations: Clear Fork (500) · Permian Basin (185) · Chautauqua Platform (33) · Thirty-One Carbonate-Chert (27) · Prue (6)

Related Comparisons

About This Comparison