Eco Power Crypto LLC vs Northwood Energy

Side-by-side comparison of two oil and gas operators in OH. Drawn from public well data and state-regulator production filings.

Important — Public-Data Disclaimer. The information shown on this page is sourced exclusively from publicly available oil and gas regulatory records (Texas Railroad Commission, Oklahoma Corporation Commission, and aggregated public well data). Valor is presenting these public records side-by-side as an informational convenience only.

Eco Power Crypto LLC

OH · 2,382 wells on file

Northwood Energy

OH · 1,629 wells on file

Side-by-Side Statistics

MetricEco Power Crypto LLCNorthwood Energy
Total wells2,3821,629
Wells producing (any time)2,3621,586
Permits filed (last 24 months)013
Most recent permit date2019-07-012026-05-07
Most recent spud date2013-09-272022-09-30
Average lateral length (ft)1,4624,306
Top formationUticaUtica
Top countyMuskingumNoble
States operating inOHOH
Last-12mo oil production (BBL)3,5262,550
Last-12mo gas production (Mcf)124,093131,610

Shared Territory

Both operators have wells in these counties:

Muskingum

Both operators target these formations / plays:

UticaMedina-Clinton-TuscaroraDevonian (Ohio)

Per-Operator Top Counties & Formations

Eco Power Crypto LLC

Counties: Muskingum (385) · Morgan (330) · Stark (200) · Medina (190) · Wayne (171)

Formations: Utica (2,262) · Medina-Clinton-Tuscarora (100) · Devonian (Ohio) (11) · Utica Shale (6) · Trenton Limestone (2)

Northwood Energy

Counties: Noble (392) · Coshocton (148) · Portage (136) · Muskingum (114) · Monroe (110)

Formations: Utica (1,462) · Medina-Clinton-Tuscarora (160) · Rose Run Sandstone (4) · Knox Dolomite (1) · Devonian (Ohio) (1)

Related Comparisons

About This Comparison