Highmark Energy Operating vs Mewbourne Oil Company

Side-by-side comparison of two oil and gas operators in OK,TX. Drawn from public well data and state-regulator production filings.

Important — Public-Data Disclaimer. The information shown on this page is sourced exclusively from publicly available oil and gas regulatory records (Texas Railroad Commission, Oklahoma Corporation Commission, and aggregated public well data). Valor is presenting these public records side-by-side as an informational convenience only.

Highmark Energy Operating

OK,TX · 2,599 wells on file

Mewbourne Oil Company

OK,TX · 2,976 wells on file

Side-by-Side Statistics

MetricHighmark Energy OperatingMewbourne Oil Company
Total wells2,5992,976
Wells producing (any time)2,4952,196
Permits filed (last 24 months)11252
Most recent permit date2026-02-202026-04-24
Most recent spud date2025-11-142026-04-24
Average lateral length (ft)2,5215,706
Top formationClevelandCleveland
Top countyMontgomeryEllis
States operating inOK,TXOK,TX
Last-12mo oil production (BBL)319,1655,977,013
Last-12mo gas production (Mcf)1,346,66941,518,846

Shared Territory

Both operators have wells in these counties:

Lipscomb

Both operators target these formations / plays:

Cleveland

Per-Operator Top Counties & Formations

Highmark Energy Operating

Counties: Montgomery (890) · Terry (491) · Andrews (316) · Lipscomb (202) · Henderson (164)

Formations: Cleveland (327) · Gulf Coast Basin (La - Tx) (288) · Conro (263) · San Andres (223) · Gilmer Lime (204)

Mewbourne Oil Company

Counties: Ellis (449) · Lipscomb (441) · Ochiltree (429) · Roger Mills (244) · Loving (208)

Formations: Cleveland (893) · Granite Wash (332) · Anadarko Basin (307) · Morrow (179) · Cherokee (170)

Related Comparisons

About This Comparison