Marjo Operating vs Nadel And Gussman

Side-by-side comparison of two oil and gas operators in OK,TX. Drawn from public well data and state-regulator production filings.

Important — Public-Data Disclaimer. The information shown on this page is sourced exclusively from publicly available oil and gas regulatory records (Texas Railroad Commission, Oklahoma Corporation Commission, and aggregated public well data). Valor is presenting these public records side-by-side as an informational convenience only.

Marjo Operating

OK,TX · 540 wells on file

Nadel And Gussman

OK,TX · 777 wells on file

Side-by-Side Statistics

MetricMarjo OperatingNadel And Gussman
Total wells540777
Wells producing (any time)262258
Permits filed (last 24 months)411
Most recent permit date2025-10-132026-03-18
Most recent spud date2026-03-062026-04-17
Average lateral length (ft)2,0703,955
Top formationChautauqua PlatformChautauqua Platform
Top countyLincolnOsage
States operating inOK,TXOK,TX
Last-12mo oil production (BBL)10,325229,900
Last-12mo gas production (Mcf)109,7692,779,887

Shared Territory

Both operators have wells in these counties:

Lincoln

Both operators target these formations / plays:

Chautauqua PlatformAnadarko Basin

Per-Operator Top Counties & Formations

Marjo Operating

Counties: Lincoln (125) · Logan (120) · Noble (55) · Payne (47) · Kay (34)

Formations: Chautauqua Platform (191) · Hunton (44) · Hunton Lm Group (36) · Anadarko Basin (28) · Mississippian (21)

Nadel And Gussman

Counties: Osage (445) · Reagan (79) · Lincoln (25) · Rusk (20) · Caddo (18)

Formations: Chautauqua Platform (299) · Excello-Mulky (133) · Spraberry (78) · Anadarko Basin (40) · Bartlesville (30)

Related Comparisons

About This Comparison