Union Pacific Resources Company vs Zarvona Energy

Side-by-side comparison of two oil and gas operators in AL,AR,CA,CO,IL,LA,MI,MS,MT,ND,NE,OK,TX,UT,WY and LA,OK,TX. Drawn from public well data and state-regulator production filings.

Important — Public-Data Disclaimer. The information shown on this page is sourced exclusively from publicly available oil and gas regulatory records (Texas Railroad Commission, Oklahoma Corporation Commission, and aggregated public well data). Valor is presenting these public records side-by-side as an informational convenience only.

Union Pacific Resources Company

AL,AR,CA,CO,IL,LA,MI,MS,MT,ND,NE,OK,TX,UT,WY · 2,464 wells on file

Zarvona Energy

LA,OK,TX · 1,653 wells on file

Side-by-Side Statistics

MetricUnion Pacific Resources CompanyZarvona Energy
Total wells2,4641,653
Wells producing (any time)7771,578
Permits filed (last 24 months)05
Most recent permit date2019-02-112026-06-09
Most recent spud date2018-06-152026-06-26
Average lateral length (ft)2,9775,773
Top formationMontereyOzona Canyon
Top countyLos AngelesCrockett
States operating inAL,AR,CA,CO,IL,LA,MI,MS,MT,ND,NE,OK,TX,UT,WYLA,OK,TX
Last-12mo oil production (BBL)691,953,203
Last-12mo gas production (Mcf)3,85224,579,964

Shared Territory

Both operators have wells in these counties:

Crockett

Both operators target these formations / plays:

Austin ChalkOzona Canyon

Per-Operator Top Counties & Formations

Union Pacific Resources Company

Counties: Los Angeles (950) · Burleson (129) · Sweetwater (110) · Crockett (93) · Slope (91)

Formations: Monterey (898) · Austin Chalk (513) · Red River (127) · Vicksburg (113) · Ozona Canyon (113)

Zarvona Energy

Counties: Crockett (825) · Upton (109) · Caddo (101) · Schleicher (75) · Andrews (69)

Formations: Ozona Canyon (808) · Austin Chalk (225) · Thirty-One Carbonate-Chert (115) · Springer (103) · San Andres (83)

Related Comparisons

About This Comparison