Bcemach vs Sandridge Exploration & Production

Side-by-side comparison of two oil and gas operators in KS,OK,WY and AR,CO,KS,LA,NM,OK,TX. Drawn from public well data and state-regulator production filings.

Important — Public-Data Disclaimer. The information shown on this page is sourced exclusively from publicly available oil and gas regulatory records (Texas Railroad Commission, Oklahoma Corporation Commission, and aggregated public well data). Valor is presenting these public records side-by-side as an informational convenience only.

Bcemach

KS,OK,WY · 3,361 wells on file

Sandridge Exploration & Production

AR,CO,KS,LA,NM,OK,TX · 3,121 wells on file

Side-by-Side Statistics

MetricBcemachSandridge Exploration & Production
Total wells3,3613,121
Wells producing (any time)3,1772,144
Permits filed (last 24 months)2916
Most recent permit date2026-05-272026-03-31
Most recent spud date2026-06-252026-04-22
Average lateral length (ft)4,5324,276
Top formationMississippianMississippian
Top countyWoodsAlfalfa
States operating inKS,OK,WYAR,CO,KS,LA,NM,OK,TX
Last-12mo oil production (BBL)7,137,8792,137,190
Last-12mo gas production (Mcf)139,346,47045,788,378

Shared Territory

Both operators have wells in these counties:

AlfalfaWoods

Both operators target these formations / plays:

MississippianManningAnadarko Basin

Per-Operator Top Counties & Formations

Bcemach

Counties: Woods (623) · Major (519) · Alfalfa (502) · Texas (320) · Lincoln (192)

Formations: Mississippian (871) · Manning (433) · Anadarko Basin (293) · Chester (242) · Woodford (210)

Sandridge Exploration & Production

Counties: Alfalfa (819) · Grant (426) · Woods (362) · Harper (324) · Andrews (277)

Formations: Mississippian (1,493) · Manning (345) · Permian Basin (256) · Anadarko Basin (203) · Arbuckle (115)

Related Comparisons

About This Comparison