Chesapeake Energy vs Sandridge Exploration & Production

Side-by-side comparison of two oil and gas operators in AL,AR,CO,KS,KY,LA,MT,ND,NM,NY,OH,OK,PA,TN,TX,UT,VA,WV,WY and AR,CO,KS,LA,NM,OK,TX. Drawn from public well data and state-regulator production filings.

Important — Public-Data Disclaimer. The information shown on this page is sourced exclusively from publicly available oil and gas regulatory records (Texas Railroad Commission, Oklahoma Corporation Commission, and aggregated public well data). Valor is presenting these public records side-by-side as an informational convenience only.

Chesapeake Energy

AL,AR,CO,KS,KY,LA,MT,ND,NM,NY,OH,OK,PA,TN,TX,UT,VA,WV,WY · 16,806 wells on file

Sandridge Exploration & Production

AR,CO,KS,LA,NM,OK,TX · 3,121 wells on file

Side-by-Side Statistics

MetricChesapeake EnergySandridge Exploration & Production
Total wells16,8063,121
Wells producing (any time)4,0882,144
Permits filed (last 24 months)116
Most recent permit date2024-09-092026-03-31
Most recent spud date2024-11-222026-04-22
Average lateral length (ft)3,9324,276
Top formationAnadarko BasinMississippian
Top countyBradfordAlfalfa
States operating inAL,AR,CO,KS,KY,LA,MT,ND,NM,NY,OH,OK,PA,TN,TX,UT,VA,WV,WYAR,CO,KS,LA,NM,OK,TX
Last-12mo oil production (BBL)216,3102,137,190
Last-12mo gas production (Mcf)3,099,56345,788,378

Shared Territory

Both operators have wells in these counties:

Woods

Both operators target these formations / plays:

Anadarko Basin

Per-Operator Top Counties & Formations

Chesapeake Energy

Counties: Bradford (1,439) · Tarrant (979) · Woods (956) · Woodward (703) · Converse (666)

Formations: Anadarko Basin (3,231) · Marcellus (2,724) · Barnett (1,284) · Austin Chalk (917) · Utica (673)

Sandridge Exploration & Production

Counties: Alfalfa (819) · Grant (426) · Woods (362) · Harper (324) · Andrews (277)

Formations: Mississippian (1,493) · Manning (345) · Permian Basin (256) · Anadarko Basin (203) · Arbuckle (115)

Related Comparisons

About This Comparison