(817) 370-0612

Chesapeake Energy vs Eog Resources

Side-by-side comparison of two oil and gas operators in AR,KS,KY,LA,NY,OH,OK,PA,TX,WY and KS,LA,MS,ND,NM,OH,OK,PA,TX,UT,WY. Drawn from public well data and state-regulator production filings.

Important — Public-Data Disclaimer. The information shown on this page is sourced exclusively from publicly available oil and gas regulatory records (Texas Railroad Commission, Oklahoma Corporation Commission, and aggregated public well data). Valor is presenting these public records side-by-side as an informational convenience only.

Chesapeake Energy

AR,KS,KY,LA,NY,OH,OK,PA,TX,WY · 16,803 wells on file

Eog Resources

KS,LA,MS,ND,NM,OH,OK,PA,TX,UT,WY · 38,681 wells on file

Side-by-Side Statistics

MetricChesapeake EnergyEog Resources
Total wells16,80338,681
Wells producing (any time)4,11016,871
Permits filed (last 24 months)01,617
Most recent permit date2024-09-092026-10-01
Most recent spud date2024-11-222026-10-02
Average lateral length (ft)3,6026,433
Top formationAnadarko BasinNiobrara- Mowry
Top countyWoodsLea
States operating inAR,KS,KY,LA,NY,OH,OK,PA,TX,WYKS,LA,MS,ND,NM,OH,OK,PA,TX,UT,WY
Last-12mo oil production (BBL)66,519152,178,511
Last-12mo gas production (Mcf)1,530,490930,286,840

Shared Territory

Both operators target these formations / plays:

Austin ChalkBarnett

Per-Operator Top Counties & Formations

Chesapeake Energy

Counties: Woods (469) · Woodward (459) · Noble (292) · Major (258) · Stephens (235)

Formations: Anadarko Basin (3,240) · Marcellus (2,724) · Barnett (1,284) · Austin Chalk (917) · Utica (673)

Eog Resources

Counties: Lea (3,055) · Gonzales (1,425) · Karnes (1,162) · Campbell (1,000) · Montague (814)

Formations: Niobrara- Mowry (6,887) · Avalon-Bone Spring (4,351) · Austin Chalk (3,894) · Muddy J Sand (1,704) · Barnett (1,664)

Related Comparisons

About This Comparison