C M S Oil And Gas Company vs Mid Michigan Gas Storage Company

Side-by-side comparison of two oil and gas operators in LA,MI,TX,WY and MI. Drawn from public well data and state-regulator production filings.

Important — Public-Data Disclaimer. The information shown on this page is sourced exclusively from publicly available oil and gas regulatory records (Texas Railroad Commission, Oklahoma Corporation Commission, and aggregated public well data). Valor is presenting these public records side-by-side as an informational convenience only.

C M S Oil And Gas Company

LA,MI,TX,WY · 1,615 wells on file

Mid Michigan Gas Storage Company

MI · 1,558 wells on file

Side-by-Side Statistics

MetricC M S Oil And Gas CompanyMid Michigan Gas Storage Company
Total wells1,6151,558
Wells producing (any time)776158
Permits filed (last 24 months)00
Most recent permit date2017-08-092005-11-21
Most recent spud date2008-09-24
Average lateral length (ft)3063,298
Top formationNiobraraAntrim
Top countyCampbellOsceola
States operating inLA,MI,TX,WYMI
Last-12mo oil production (BBL)103135
Last-12mo gas production (Mcf)1,5150

Shared Territory

Both operators target these formations / plays:

Antrim

Per-Operator Top Counties & Formations

C M S Oil And Gas Company

Counties: Campbell (864) · Sheridan (463) · Grand Traverse (83) · Kalkaska (59) · Otsego (28)

Formations: Niobrara (744) · Powder River Basin (298) · Antrim (237) · Cook Coal (32) · Canyon (30)

Mid Michigan Gas Storage Company

Counties: Osceola (520) · Clare (314) · Newaygo (286) · Mecosta (226) · St Clair (99)

Formations: Antrim (1,517) · Reed City (25) · Michigan Stray (11) · Niagaran (5)

Related Comparisons

About This Comparison