C M S Oil And Gas Company vs Huber J M

Side-by-side comparison of two oil and gas operators in LA,MI,TX,WY and AL,AR,IL,KS,MI,MT,OK,TX,WY. Drawn from public well data and state-regulator production filings.

Important — Public-Data Disclaimer. The information shown on this page is sourced exclusively from publicly available oil and gas regulatory records (Texas Railroad Commission, Oklahoma Corporation Commission, and aggregated public well data). Valor is presenting these public records side-by-side as an informational convenience only.

C M S Oil And Gas Company

LA,MI,TX,WY · 1,615 wells on file

Huber J M

AL,AR,IL,KS,MI,MT,OK,TX,WY · 3,447 wells on file

Side-by-Side Statistics

MetricC M S Oil And Gas CompanyHuber J M
Total wells1,6153,447
Wells producing (any time)7761,770
Permits filed (last 24 months)00
Most recent permit date2017-08-092017-08-09
Most recent spud date2008-09-242010-09-27
Average lateral length (ft)306671
Top formationNiobraraNiobrara
Top countyCampbellSheridan
States operating inLA,MI,TX,WYAL,AR,IL,KS,MI,MT,OK,TX,WY
Last-12mo oil production (BBL)1030
Last-12mo gas production (Mcf)1,5150

Shared Territory

Both operators have wells in these counties:

SheridanCampbell

Both operators target these formations / plays:

NiobraraPowder River Basin

Per-Operator Top Counties & Formations

C M S Oil And Gas Company

Counties: Campbell (864) · Sheridan (463) · Grand Traverse (83) · Kalkaska (59) · Otsego (28)

Formations: Niobrara (744) · Powder River Basin (298) · Antrim (237) · Cook Coal (32) · Canyon (30)

Huber J M

Counties: Sheridan (2,202) · Campbell (717) · Hutchinson (132) · Johnson (48) · Carson (27)

Formations: Niobrara (728) · Powder River Basin (676) · Mowry (577) · Granite Wash (137) · Monarch (105)

Related Comparisons

About This Comparison