Chesapeake Energy vs Exco Resources Pa

Side-by-side comparison of two oil and gas operators in AL,AR,CO,KS,KY,LA,MT,ND,NM,NY,OH,OK,PA,TN,TX,UT,VA,WV,WY and CO,KS,LA,MS,NE,NM,OK,PA,TX,VA,WV,WY. Drawn from public well data and state-regulator production filings.

Important — Public-Data Disclaimer. The information shown on this page is sourced exclusively from publicly available oil and gas regulatory records (Texas Railroad Commission, Oklahoma Corporation Commission, and aggregated public well data). Valor is presenting these public records side-by-side as an informational convenience only.

Chesapeake Energy

AL,AR,CO,KS,KY,LA,MT,ND,NM,NY,OH,OK,PA,TN,TX,UT,VA,WV,WY · 16,806 wells on file

Exco Resources Pa

CO,KS,LA,MS,NE,NM,OK,PA,TX,VA,WV,WY · 2,085 wells on file

Side-by-Side Statistics

MetricChesapeake EnergyExco Resources Pa
Total wells16,8062,085
Wells producing (any time)4,088524
Permits filed (last 24 months)12
Most recent permit date2024-09-092025-11-19
Most recent spud date2024-11-222025-11-06
Average lateral length (ft)3,9323,858
Top formationAnadarko BasinMarcellus
Top countyBradfordJackson
States operating inAL,AR,CO,KS,KY,LA,MT,ND,NM,NY,OH,OK,PA,TN,TX,UT,VA,WV,WYCO,KS,LA,MS,NE,NM,OK,PA,TX,VA,WV,WY
Last-12mo oil production (BBL)216,3101,025
Last-12mo gas production (Mcf)3,099,56312,528,696

Shared Territory

Both operators target these formations / plays:

Anadarko BasinMarcellusUtica

Per-Operator Top Counties & Formations

Chesapeake Energy

Counties: Bradford (1,439) · Tarrant (979) · Woods (956) · Woodward (703) · Converse (666)

Formations: Anadarko Basin (3,231) · Marcellus (2,724) · Barnett (1,284) · Austin Chalk (917) · Utica (673)

Exco Resources Pa

Counties: Jackson (200) · Lycoming (195) · Centre (153) · Clearfield (145) · Warren (140)

Formations: Marcellus (1,054) · Utica (532) · Appalachian Basin (90) · Anadarko Basin (69) · Middlesex (35)

Related Comparisons

About This Comparison