Lewis Petro Properties vs Trinity Operating Usg

Side-by-side comparison of two oil and gas operators in TX and LA,OK,TX. Drawn from public well data and state-regulator production filings.

Important — Public-Data Disclaimer. The information shown on this page is sourced exclusively from publicly available oil and gas regulatory records (Texas Railroad Commission, Oklahoma Corporation Commission, and aggregated public well data). Valor is presenting these public records side-by-side as an informational convenience only.

Lewis Petro Properties

TX · 3,405 wells on file

Trinity Operating Usg

LA,OK,TX · 2,182 wells on file

Side-by-Side Statistics

MetricLewis Petro PropertiesTrinity Operating Usg
Total wells3,4052,182
Wells producing (any time)2,9051,919
Permits filed (last 24 months)8420
Most recent permit date2026-06-162025-02-18
Most recent spud date2026-06-192025-03-08
Average lateral length (ft)5,7956,977
Top formationOlmosWoodford-Caney
Top countyWebbPittsburg
States operating inTXLA,OK,TX
Last-12mo oil production (BBL)1,397,2733,324,409
Last-12mo gas production (Mcf)259,881,789198,428,501

Shared Territory

Both operators have wells in these counties:

La SalleDimmit

Both operators target these formations / plays:

Austin ChalkOlmos

Per-Operator Top Counties & Formations

Lewis Petro Properties

Counties: Webb (2,468) · La Salle (807) · Dimmit (120) · Lavaca (3) · Frio (2)

Formations: Olmos (2,551) · Austin Chalk (301) · Eagle Ford (232) · Olmos (70) · Eagleford Shale (56)

Trinity Operating Usg

Counties: Pittsburg (456) · Hughes (421) · La Salle (177) · Caddo (159) · Dimmit (159)

Formations: Woodford-Caney (851) · Austin Chalk (519) · Woodford (192) · Olmos (130) · Jurrasic Lime (82)

Related Comparisons

About This Comparison