Comstock Oil & Gas vs Trinity Operating Usg

Side-by-side comparison of two oil and gas operators in AR,CA,KY,LA,MS,OK,TX and LA,OK,TX. Drawn from public well data and state-regulator production filings.

Important — Public-Data Disclaimer. The information shown on this page is sourced exclusively from publicly available oil and gas regulatory records (Texas Railroad Commission, Oklahoma Corporation Commission, and aggregated public well data). Valor is presenting these public records side-by-side as an informational convenience only.

Comstock Oil & Gas

AR,CA,KY,LA,MS,OK,TX · 1,985 wells on file

Trinity Operating Usg

LA,OK,TX · 2,182 wells on file

Side-by-Side Statistics

MetricComstock Oil & GasTrinity Operating Usg
Total wells1,9852,182
Wells producing (any time)1,4411,919
Permits filed (last 24 months)13520
Most recent permit date2026-07-022025-02-18
Most recent spud date2026-07-032025-03-08
Average lateral length (ft)6,8276,977
Top formationTravis PeakWoodford-Caney
Top countyDe SotoPittsburg
States operating inAR,CA,KY,LA,MS,OK,TXLA,OK,TX
Last-12mo oil production (BBL)12,8233,324,409
Last-12mo gas production (Mcf)471,966,248198,428,501

Shared Territory

Both operators have wells in these counties:

Caddo

Both operators target these formations / plays:

Jurrasic LimeAustin Chalk

Per-Operator Top Counties & Formations

Comstock Oil & Gas

Counties: De Soto (724) · Harrison (272) · Robertson (132) · Caddo (118) · Bossier (83)

Formations: Travis Peak (893) · Jurrasic Lime (184) · Austin Chalk (122) · Haynesville (109) · Gilmer Lime (97)

Trinity Operating Usg

Counties: Pittsburg (456) · Hughes (421) · La Salle (177) · Caddo (159) · Dimmit (159)

Formations: Woodford-Caney (851) · Austin Chalk (519) · Woodford (192) · Olmos (130) · Jurrasic Lime (82)

Related Comparisons

About This Comparison