Comstock Oil & Gas vs Expand Operating LLC

Side-by-side comparison of two oil and gas operators in AR,CA,KY,LA,MS,OK,TX and LA,OH,TX,WV. Drawn from public well data and state-regulator production filings.

Important — Public-Data Disclaimer. The information shown on this page is sourced exclusively from publicly available oil and gas regulatory records (Texas Railroad Commission, Oklahoma Corporation Commission, and aggregated public well data). Valor is presenting these public records side-by-side as an informational convenience only.

Comstock Oil & Gas

AR,CA,KY,LA,MS,OK,TX · 1,985 wells on file

Expand Operating LLC

LA,OH,TX,WV · 3,559 wells on file

Side-by-Side Statistics

MetricComstock Oil & GasExpand Operating LLC
Total wells1,9853,559
Wells producing (any time)1,4413,339
Permits filed (last 24 months)135246
Most recent permit date2026-07-022026-06-25
Most recent spud date2026-07-032026-07-03
Average lateral length (ft)6,8277,361
Top formationTravis PeakTravis Peak
Top countyDe SotoDe Soto
States operating inAR,CA,KY,LA,MS,OK,TXLA,OH,TX,WV
Last-12mo oil production (BBL)12,8233,743,147
Last-12mo gas production (Mcf)471,966,2481,245,691,894

Shared Territory

Both operators have wells in these counties:

De SotoCaddo

Both operators target these formations / plays:

Travis PeakAustin ChalkHaynesville

Per-Operator Top Counties & Formations

Comstock Oil & Gas

Counties: De Soto (724) · Harrison (272) · Robertson (132) · Caddo (118) · Bossier (83)

Formations: Travis Peak (893) · Jurrasic Lime (184) · Austin Chalk (122) · Haynesville (109) · Gilmer Lime (97)

Expand Operating LLC

Counties: De Soto (1,149) · Red River (616) · Caddo (343) · Sabine (296) · Ohio (240)

Formations: Travis Peak (1,331) · Marcellus (486) · Austin Chalk (347) · Utica (243) · Haynesville (217)

Related Comparisons

About This Comparison