Brookston Energy vs Urban Oil & Gas Group

Side-by-side comparison of two oil and gas operators in TX and OK,TX. Drawn from public well data and state-regulator production filings.

Important — Public-Data Disclaimer. The information shown on this page is sourced exclusively from publicly available oil and gas regulatory records (Texas Railroad Commission, Oklahoma Corporation Commission, and aggregated public well data). Valor is presenting these public records side-by-side as an informational convenience only.

Brookston Energy

TX · 864 wells on file

Urban Oil & Gas Group

OK,TX · 1,754 wells on file

Side-by-Side Statistics

MetricBrookston EnergyUrban Oil & Gas Group
Total wells8641,754
Wells producing (any time)8561,511
Permits filed (last 24 months)172
Most recent permit date2026-04-242026-02-20
Most recent spud date2013-11-232023-03-17
Average lateral length (ft)1,4302,870
Top formationTravis PeakVicksburg
Top countyHarrisonNueces
States operating inTXOK,TX
Last-12mo oil production (BBL)42,73119,994
Last-12mo gas production (Mcf)1,436,8093,810,768

Shared Territory

Both operators have wells in these counties:

Nacogdoches

Both operators target these formations / plays:

Travis PeakAustin ChalkCotton Valley

Per-Operator Top Counties & Formations

Brookston Energy

Counties: Harrison (532) · Panola (183) · Rusk (56) · Shelby (55) · Nacogdoches (30)

Formations: Travis Peak (832) · Austin Chalk (26) · Cotton Valley (5) · Travis Peak (1)

Urban Oil & Gas Group

Counties: Nueces (544) · Henderson (309) · Nacogdoches (241) · Ellis (108) · Cherokee (88)

Formations: Vicksburg (592) · Travis Peak (288) · Cotton Valley (288) · Anadarko Basin (115) · Austin Chalk (53)

Related Comparisons

About This Comparison