Union Pacific Resources Company vs Urban Oil & Gas Group

Side-by-side comparison of two oil and gas operators in OK,TX. Drawn from public well data and state-regulator production filings.

Important — Public-Data Disclaimer. The information shown on this page is sourced exclusively from publicly available oil and gas regulatory records (Texas Railroad Commission, Oklahoma Corporation Commission, and aggregated public well data). Valor is presenting these public records side-by-side as an informational convenience only.

Union Pacific Resources Company

OK,TX · 970 wells on file

Urban Oil & Gas Group

OK,TX · 1,754 wells on file

Side-by-Side Statistics

MetricUnion Pacific Resources CompanyUrban Oil & Gas Group
Total wells9701,754
Wells producing (any time)4161,511
Permits filed (last 24 months)02
Most recent permit date2014-04-082026-02-20
Most recent spud date2004-12-122023-03-17
Average lateral length (ft)3,3632,870
Top formationAustin ChalkVicksburg
Top countyBurlesonNueces
States operating inOK,TXOK,TX
Last-12mo oil production (BBL)1219,994
Last-12mo gas production (Mcf)1,3813,810,768

Shared Territory

Both operators have wells in these counties:

Nueces

Both operators target these formations / plays:

Austin ChalkVicksburgTravis Peak

Per-Operator Top Counties & Formations

Union Pacific Resources Company

Counties: Burleson (129) · Crockett (93) · Nueces (91) · Lee (80) · Brazos (72)

Formations: Austin Chalk (475) · Vicksburg (113) · Ozona Canyon (113) · Travis Peak (103) · Gilmer Lime (31)

Urban Oil & Gas Group

Counties: Nueces (544) · Henderson (309) · Nacogdoches (241) · Ellis (108) · Cherokee (88)

Formations: Vicksburg (592) · Travis Peak (288) · Cotton Valley (288) · Anadarko Basin (115) · Austin Chalk (53)

Related Comparisons

About This Comparison