Eiger Operating Company, LLC vs Mack Energy Company

Side-by-side comparison of two oil and gas operators in KS,OK and KS,LA,OK,TX. Drawn from public well data and state-regulator production filings.

Important — Public-Data Disclaimer. The information shown on this page is sourced exclusively from publicly available oil and gas regulatory records (Texas Railroad Commission, Oklahoma Corporation Commission, and aggregated public well data). Valor is presenting these public records side-by-side as an informational convenience only.

Eiger Operating Company, LLC

KS,OK · 3,582 wells on file

Mack Energy Company

KS,LA,OK,TX · 1,604 wells on file

Side-by-Side Statistics

MetricEiger Operating Company, LLCMack Energy Company
Total wells3,5821,604
Wells producing (any time)3,321669
Permits filed (last 24 months)130
Most recent permit date2026-06-012024-03-29
Most recent spud date2026-06-012024-10-17
Average lateral length (ft)1,621800
Top formationAnadarko BasinWoodford
Top countyMortonCarter
States operating inKS,OKKS,LA,OK,TX
Last-12mo oil production (BBL)381,555713,830
Last-12mo gas production (Mcf)6,372,1431,204,327

Shared Territory

Both operators have wells in these counties:

Grant

Both operators target these formations / plays:

Anadarko BasinMorrow

Per-Operator Top Counties & Formations

Eiger Operating Company, LLC

Counties: Morton (796) · Stevens (666) · Haskell (652) · Grant (554) · Seward (418)

Formations: Anadarko Basin (1,973) · Chase (543) · St. Louis (221) · Morrow (153) · Council Grove Group (123)

Mack Energy Company

Counties: Carter (461) · Grady (424) · Stephens (319) · Grant (41) · Alfalfa (40)

Formations: Woodford (819) · South Oklahoma Folded Belt (224) · Anadarko Basin (195) · Morrow (87) · Chautauqua Platform (65)

Related Comparisons

About This Comparison