Mack Energy Company vs Unit Petroleum Company

Side-by-side comparison of two oil and gas operators in KS,LA,OK,TX and AL,AR,CO,KS,LA,MS,MT,ND,NM,OK,TX,WY. Drawn from public well data and state-regulator production filings.

Important — Public-Data Disclaimer. The information shown on this page is sourced exclusively from publicly available oil and gas regulatory records (Texas Railroad Commission, Oklahoma Corporation Commission, and aggregated public well data). Valor is presenting these public records side-by-side as an informational convenience only.

Mack Energy Company

KS,LA,OK,TX · 1,604 wells on file

Unit Petroleum Company

AL,AR,CO,KS,LA,MS,MT,ND,NM,OK,TX,WY · 2,398 wells on file

Side-by-Side Statistics

MetricMack Energy CompanyUnit Petroleum Company
Total wells1,6042,398
Wells producing (any time)6691,484
Permits filed (last 24 months)03
Most recent permit date2024-03-292025-04-07
Most recent spud date2024-10-172023-12-15
Average lateral length (ft)8003,474
Top formationWoodfordGranite Wash
Top countyCarterHemphill
States operating inKS,LA,OK,TXAL,AR,CO,KS,LA,MS,MT,ND,NM,OK,TX,WY
Last-12mo oil production (BBL)713,8301,058,256
Last-12mo gas production (Mcf)1,204,32719,029,303

Shared Territory

Both operators have wells in these counties:

Grady

Both operators target these formations / plays:

Anadarko BasinWoodfordChautauqua Platform

Per-Operator Top Counties & Formations

Mack Energy Company

Counties: Carter (461) · Grady (424) · Stephens (319) · Grant (41) · Alfalfa (40)

Formations: Woodford (819) · South Oklahoma Folded Belt (224) · Anadarko Basin (195) · Morrow (87) · Chautauqua Platform (65)

Unit Petroleum Company

Counties: Hemphill (225) · Ellis (205) · Grady (179) · Roberts (162) · Custer (150)

Formations: Granite Wash (396) · Anadarko Basin (275) · Woodford (186) · Cleveland (145) · Chautauqua Platform (129)

Related Comparisons

About This Comparison