Citation Oil & Gas vs Mack Energy Company

Side-by-side comparison of two oil and gas operators in CO,IL,KS,LA,MS,MT,ND,NE,NM,OK,TX,UT,WY and KS,LA,OK,TX. Drawn from public well data and state-regulator production filings.

Important — Public-Data Disclaimer. The information shown on this page is sourced exclusively from publicly available oil and gas regulatory records (Texas Railroad Commission, Oklahoma Corporation Commission, and aggregated public well data). Valor is presenting these public records side-by-side as an informational convenience only.

Citation Oil & Gas

CO,IL,KS,LA,MS,MT,ND,NE,NM,OK,TX,UT,WY · 15,306 wells on file

Mack Energy Company

KS,LA,OK,TX · 1,604 wells on file

Side-by-Side Statistics

MetricCitation Oil & GasMack Energy Company
Total wells15,3061,604
Wells producing (any time)8,310669
Permits filed (last 24 months)800
Most recent permit date2026-06-222024-03-29
Most recent spud date2026-07-062024-10-17
Average lateral length (ft)1,281800
Top formationWoodfordWoodford
Top countyCarterCarter
States operating inCO,IL,KS,LA,MS,MT,ND,NE,NM,OK,TX,UT,WYKS,LA,OK,TX
Last-12mo oil production (BBL)8,359,854713,830
Last-12mo gas production (Mcf)33,200,8151,204,327

Shared Territory

Both operators have wells in these counties:

CarterStephens

Both operators target these formations / plays:

WoodfordSouth Oklahoma Folded Belt

Per-Operator Top Counties & Formations

Citation Oil & Gas

Counties: Carter (4,858) · Stephens (2,263) · Pontotoc (1,166) · Howard (646) · Caddo (497)

Formations: Woodford (3,560) · South Oklahoma Folded Belt (1,966) · Healdton (714) · Illinois Basin (610) · Thirty-One Carbonate-Chert (563)

Mack Energy Company

Counties: Carter (461) · Grady (424) · Stephens (319) · Grant (41) · Alfalfa (40)

Formations: Woodford (819) · South Oklahoma Folded Belt (224) · Anadarko Basin (195) · Morrow (87) · Chautauqua Platform (65)

Related Comparisons

About This Comparison