(817) 370-0612

Belden And Blake Corp Dba Ward Lake Energy vs Greylock Conventional

Side-by-side comparison of two oil and gas operators in MI,OH,PA and PA,WV. Drawn from public well data and state-regulator production filings.

Important — Public-Data Disclaimer. The information shown on this page is sourced exclusively from publicly available oil and gas regulatory records (Texas Railroad Commission, Oklahoma Corporation Commission, and aggregated public well data). Valor is presenting these public records side-by-side as an informational convenience only.

Belden And Blake Corp Dba Ward Lake Energy

MI,OH,PA · 1,763 wells on file

Greylock Conventional

PA,WV · 2,663 wells on file

Side-by-Side Statistics

MetricBelden And Blake Corp Dba Ward Lake EnergyGreylock Conventional
Total wells1,7632,663
Wells producing (any time)5282,632
Permits filed (last 24 months)032
Most recent permit date2010-10-252026-10-01
Most recent spud date2008-09-032019-09-06
Average lateral length (ft)5561,269
Top formationUticaMarcellus
Top countyOtsegoIndiana
States operating inMI,OH,PAPA,WV
Last-12mo oil production (BBL)0169
Last-12mo gas production (Mcf)0423,508

Shared Territory

Both operators have wells in these counties:

Indiana

Both operators target these formations / plays:

MarcellusMedina-Clinton-TuscaroraUtica

Per-Operator Top Counties & Formations

Belden And Blake Corp Dba Ward Lake Energy

Counties: Otsego (44) · Antrim (9) · Indiana (7) · Manistee (6) · Van Wert (5)

Formations: Utica (827) · Antrim (514) · Marcellus (121) · Michigan Basin (92) · Medina-Clinton-Tuscarora (46)

Greylock Conventional

Counties: Indiana (506) · Kanawha (492) · Clearfield (255) · Armstrong (164) · Logan (153)

Formations: Marcellus (2,144) · Medina-Clinton-Tuscarora (236) · Appalachian Basin - (Eastern Overthrust Area) (76) · Utica (69) · Berea-Murrysville (39)

Related Comparisons

About This Comparison