Carter Oil Company vs Riverside Energy Michigan

Side-by-side comparison of two oil and gas operators in AR,CO,IL,KY,MI,MO,MS,MT,ND,TN,UT,WY and MI. Drawn from public well data and state-regulator production filings.

Important — Public-Data Disclaimer. The information shown on this page is sourced exclusively from publicly available oil and gas regulatory records (Texas Railroad Commission, Oklahoma Corporation Commission, and aggregated public well data). Valor is presenting these public records side-by-side as an informational convenience only.

Carter Oil Company

AR,CO,IL,KY,MI,MO,MS,MT,ND,TN,UT,WY · 3,524 wells on file

Riverside Energy Michigan

MI · 6,995 wells on file

Side-by-Side Statistics

MetricCarter Oil CompanyRiverside Energy Michigan
Total wells3,5246,995
Wells producing (any time)576,500
Permits filed (last 24 months)42
Most recent permit date2024-07-172025-11-07
Most recent spud date2024-11-29
Average lateral length (ft)2621,246
Top formationIllinois BasinAntrim
Top countyFayetteOtsego
States operating inAR,CO,IL,KY,MI,MO,MS,MT,ND,TN,UT,WYMI
Last-12mo oil production (BBL)015,641
Last-12mo gas production (Mcf)025,324,851

Shared Territory

Both operators target these formations / plays:

AntrimMichigan Basin

Per-Operator Top Counties & Formations

Carter Oil Company

Counties: Fayette (534) · Oceana (398) · Henderson (255) · Gallatin (175) · Union (165)

Formations: Illinois Basin (1,219) · Antrim (1,212) · New Albany (374) · Michigan Basin (107) · Sweetgrass Arch (76)

Riverside Energy Michigan

Counties: Otsego (1,714) · Antrim (1,690) · Montmorency (1,554) · Alpena (770) · Alcona (353)

Formations: Antrim (5,924) · Antrim (1,031) · Michigan Basin (35) · Niagaran (4) · Burnt Bluff (1)

Related Comparisons

About This Comparison