(817) 370-0612

Encana Oil & Gas vs Union Pacific Resources Company

Side-by-side comparison of two oil and gas operators in CO,LA,TX,WY and CA,IL,LA,TX,WY. Drawn from public well data and state-regulator production filings.

Important — Public-Data Disclaimer. The information shown on this page is sourced exclusively from publicly available oil and gas regulatory records (Texas Railroad Commission, Oklahoma Corporation Commission, and aggregated public well data). Valor is presenting these public records side-by-side as an informational convenience only.

Encana Oil & Gas

CO,LA,TX,WY · 2,991 wells on file

Union Pacific Resources Company

CA,IL,LA,TX,WY · 2,464 wells on file

Side-by-Side Statistics

MetricEncana Oil & GasUnion Pacific Resources Company
Total wells2,9912,464
Wells producing (any time)300777
Permits filed (last 24 months)00
Most recent permit date2020-12-222019-02-11
Most recent spud date2021-09-102018-06-15
Average lateral length (ft)2,5142,974
Top formationMesaverdeMonterey
Top countyRed RiverLos Angeles
States operating inCO,LA,TX,WYCA,IL,LA,TX,WY
Last-12mo oil production (BBL)23755
Last-12mo gas production (Mcf)11,4591,573

Shared Territory

Both operators have wells in these counties:

Sweetwater

Both operators target these formations / plays:

Austin Chalk

Per-Operator Top Counties & Formations

Encana Oil & Gas

Counties: Red River (50) · Fremont (32) · Sublette (20) · Sweetwater (16) · Garfield (12)

Formations: Mesaverde (889) · Muddy J Sand (291) · Mesaverde-Lance (262) · Austin Chalk (242) · Barnett (180)

Union Pacific Resources Company

Counties: Los Angeles (562) · Vernon (17) · Sweetwater (15) · Laramie (11) · Alexander (11)

Formations: Monterey (898) · Austin Chalk (513) · Red River (127) · Ozona Canyon (113) · Vicksburg (113)

Related Comparisons

About This Comparison