(817) 370-0612

Foundation Energy Management vs Trinity Operating Usg

Side-by-side comparison of two oil and gas operators in ND,OK,TX and LA,OK,TX. Drawn from public well data and state-regulator production filings.

Important — Public-Data Disclaimer. The information shown on this page is sourced exclusively from publicly available oil and gas regulatory records (Texas Railroad Commission, Oklahoma Corporation Commission, and aggregated public well data). Valor is presenting these public records side-by-side as an informational convenience only.

Foundation Energy Management

ND,OK,TX · 1,905 wells on file

Trinity Operating Usg

LA,OK,TX · 2,182 wells on file

Side-by-Side Statistics

MetricFoundation Energy ManagementTrinity Operating Usg
Total wells1,9052,182
Wells producing (any time)1,6381,917
Permits filed (last 24 months)49
Most recent permit date2026-05-072026-09-15
Most recent spud date2026-02-042025-03-08
Average lateral length (ft)3,8526,848
Top formationWoodford-CaneyWoodford-Caney
Top countyCoalPittsburg
States operating inND,OK,TXLA,OK,TX
Last-12mo oil production (BBL)484,8142,038,610
Last-12mo gas production (Mcf)18,401,097130,426,457

Shared Territory

Both operators have wells in these counties:

CoalHughes

Both operators target these formations / plays:

Woodford-Caney

Per-Operator Top Counties & Formations

Foundation Energy Management

Counties: Coal (195) · Beaver (187) · Hughes (178) · Billings (95) · Texas (87)

Formations: Woodford-Caney (384) · Niobrara East (274) · Morrow (221) · Bakken (209) · Chester (134)

Trinity Operating Usg

Counties: Pittsburg (443) · Hughes (409) · La Salle (167) · Coal (151) · Mcmullen (142)

Formations: Woodford-Caney (851) · Austin Chalk (519) · Woodford (192) · Olmos (130) · Jurrasic Lime (100)

Related Comparisons

About This Comparison