Foundation Energy Management vs Trinity Operating Usg

Side-by-side comparison of two oil and gas operators in OK,TX. Drawn from public well data and state-regulator production filings.

Important — Public-Data Disclaimer. The information shown on this page is sourced exclusively from publicly available oil and gas regulatory records (Texas Railroad Commission, Oklahoma Corporation Commission, and aggregated public well data). Valor is presenting these public records side-by-side as an informational convenience only.

Foundation Energy Management

OK,TX · 1,128 wells on file

Trinity Operating Usg

OK,TX · 2,023 wells on file

Side-by-Side Statistics

MetricFoundation Energy ManagementTrinity Operating Usg
Total wells1,1282,023
Wells producing (any time)1,0061,820
Permits filed (last 24 months)710
Most recent permit date2026-02-112025-02-18
Most recent spud date2026-02-042025-02-21
Average lateral length (ft)3,9486,696
Top formationWoodford-CaneyWoodford-Caney
Top countyBeaverPittsburg
States operating inOK,TXOK,TX
Last-12mo oil production (BBL)57,191920,140
Last-12mo gas production (Mcf)5,908,30432,062,086

Shared Territory

Both operators have wells in these counties:

HughesCoal

Both operators target these formations / plays:

Woodford-CaneyWoodford

Per-Operator Top Counties & Formations

Foundation Energy Management

Counties: Beaver (289) · Coal (199) · Hughes (183) · Texas (129) · Harper (92)

Formations: Woodford-Caney (385) · Morrow (220) · Chester (134) · Woodford (27) · Anadarko Basin (22)

Trinity Operating Usg

Counties: Pittsburg (456) · Hughes (421) · La Salle (177) · Dimmit (159) · Coal (158)

Formations: Woodford-Caney (851) · Austin Chalk (519) · Woodford (192) · Olmos (130) · Del Rio (48)

Related Comparisons

About This Comparison