(817) 370-0612

Highmark Energy Operating vs Mcgowan Working Partners

Side-by-side comparison of two oil and gas operators in LA,MS,OK,TX and AR,LA,MS,TX. Drawn from public well data and state-regulator production filings.

Important — Public-Data Disclaimer. The information shown on this page is sourced exclusively from publicly available oil and gas regulatory records (Texas Railroad Commission, Oklahoma Corporation Commission, and aggregated public well data). Valor is presenting these public records side-by-side as an informational convenience only.

Highmark Energy Operating

LA,MS,OK,TX · 3,724 wells on file

Mcgowan Working Partners

AR,LA,MS,TX · 1,777 wells on file

Side-by-Side Statistics

MetricHighmark Energy OperatingMcgowan Working Partners
Total wells3,7241,777
Wells producing (any time)3,4171,196
Permits filed (last 24 months)4130
Most recent permit date2026-04-142023-12-12
Most recent spud date2025-11-142019-08-30
Average lateral length (ft)2,0432,849
Top formationCotton ValleyGulf Coast Basin (La - Tx)
Top countyMontgomeryWharton
States operating inLA,MS,OK,TXAR,LA,MS,TX
Last-12mo oil production (BBL)1,664,695456,469
Last-12mo gas production (Mcf)8,911,710779,686

Shared Territory

Both operators target these formations / plays:

Gulf Coast Basin (La - Tx)Cotton Valley

Per-Operator Top Counties & Formations

Highmark Energy Operating

Counties: Montgomery (387) · Terry (379) · Yazoo (320) · Webster (273) · Andrews (227)

Formations: Cotton Valley (531) · Cleveland (321) · Tinsley Co Oil Pool (290) · Gulf Coast Basin (La - Tx) (290) · Clear Fork (255)

Mcgowan Working Partners

Counties: Wharton (121) · Jackson (100) · San Patricio (92) · Acadia (72) · Union (68)

Formations: Gulf Coast Basin (La - Tx) (264) · Austin Chalk (217) · Arkla Basin (100) · Cotton Valley (87) · Wilcox (67)

Related Comparisons

About This Comparison