Huber J M vs Pennaco Energy Incorporated

Side-by-side comparison of two oil and gas operators in AL,AR,IL,KS,MI,MT,OK,TX,WY and MT,WY. Drawn from public well data and state-regulator production filings.

Important — Public-Data Disclaimer. The information shown on this page is sourced exclusively from publicly available oil and gas regulatory records (Texas Railroad Commission, Oklahoma Corporation Commission, and aggregated public well data). Valor is presenting these public records side-by-side as an informational convenience only.

Huber J M

AL,AR,IL,KS,MI,MT,OK,TX,WY · 3,447 wells on file

Pennaco Energy Incorporated

MT,WY · 3,715 wells on file

Side-by-Side Statistics

MetricHuber J MPennaco Energy Incorporated
Total wells3,4473,715
Wells producing (any time)1,7702,520
Permits filed (last 24 months)00
Most recent permit date2017-08-092017-08-09
Most recent spud date2010-09-272019-12-06
Average lateral length (ft)671324
Top formationNiobraraNiobrara
Top countySheridanCampbell
States operating inAL,AR,IL,KS,MI,MT,OK,TX,WYMT,WY
Last-12mo oil production (BBL)00
Last-12mo gas production (Mcf)00

Shared Territory

Both operators have wells in these counties:

SheridanCampbellJohnson

Both operators target these formations / plays:

NiobraraPowder River BasinMonarch

Per-Operator Top Counties & Formations

Huber J M

Counties: Sheridan (2,202) · Campbell (717) · Hutchinson (132) · Johnson (48) · Carson (27)

Formations: Niobrara (728) · Powder River Basin (676) · Mowry (577) · Granite Wash (137) · Monarch (105)

Pennaco Energy Incorporated

Counties: Campbell (2,248) · Sheridan (1,206) · Johnson (259) · Powder River (1) · Big Horn (1)

Formations: Niobrara (1,267) · Niobrara- Mowry (749) · Powder River Basin (464) · Monarch (318) · Anderson (183)

Related Comparisons

About This Comparison