Qb Energy Operating LLC vs Tep Rocky Mountain

Side-by-side comparison of two oil and gas operators in CO. Drawn from public well data and state-regulator production filings.

Important — Public-Data Disclaimer. The information shown on this page is sourced exclusively from publicly available oil and gas regulatory records (Texas Railroad Commission, Oklahoma Corporation Commission, and aggregated public well data). Valor is presenting these public records side-by-side as an informational convenience only.

Qb Energy Operating LLC

CO · 6,118 wells on file

Tep Rocky Mountain

CO · 9,042 wells on file

Side-by-Side Statistics

MetricQb Energy Operating LLCTep Rocky Mountain
Total wells6,1189,042
Wells producing (any time)5,2007,317
Permits filed (last 24 months)5564
Most recent permit date2026-06-022026-05-14
Most recent spud date2026-04-242026-03-06
Average lateral length (ft)522483
Top formationMesaverdeMesaverde
Top countyGarfieldGarfield
States operating inCOCO
Last-12mo oil production (BBL)236,303492,958
Last-12mo gas production (Mcf)94,152,598147,053,794

Shared Territory

Both operators have wells in these counties:

GarfieldRio Blanco

Both operators target these formations / plays:

MesaverdePiceance BasinWilliams Fork

Per-Operator Top Counties & Formations

Qb Energy Operating LLC

Counties: Garfield (5,027) · Rio Blanco (887) · Mesa (199) · Moffat (5)

Formations: Mesaverde (5,921) · Piceance Basin (57) · Wmfk (41) · Crcrn (28) · Williams Fork (16)

Tep Rocky Mountain

Counties: Garfield (8,148) · Rio Blanco (805) · Las Animas (65) · Yuma (15) · Kiowa (4)

Formations: Mesaverde (8,746) · Piceance Basin (85) · Pierre -Niobrara (65) · Williams Fork (64) · Wfcrcc (17)

Related Comparisons

About This Comparison