(817) 370-0612

Qep Energy Company vs Sm Energy Company

Side-by-side comparison of two oil and gas operators in LA,OK,TX,UT,WY and OK,TX,UT,WY. Drawn from public well data and state-regulator production filings.

Important — Public-Data Disclaimer. The information shown on this page is sourced exclusively from publicly available oil and gas regulatory records (Texas Railroad Commission, Oklahoma Corporation Commission, and aggregated public well data). Valor is presenting these public records side-by-side as an informational convenience only.

Qep Energy Company

LA,OK,TX,UT,WY · 1,698 wells on file

Sm Energy Company

OK,TX,UT,WY · 3,611 wells on file

Side-by-Side Statistics

MetricQep Energy CompanySm Energy Company
Total wells1,6983,611
Wells producing (any time)3092,557
Permits filed (last 24 months)0246
Most recent permit date2024-07-172026-09-22
Most recent spud date2023-01-132026-09-17
Average lateral length (ft)2,7818,798
Top formationMesaverde-WasatchAustin Chalk
Top countyHaskellDuchesne
States operating inLA,OK,TX,UT,WYOK,TX,UT,WY
Last-12mo oil production (BBL)59329,893,062
Last-12mo gas production (Mcf)81,677124,821,606

Shared Territory

Both operators have wells in these counties:

Martin

Both operators target these formations / plays:

Mesaverde-Wasatch

Per-Operator Top Counties & Formations

Qep Energy Company

Counties: Haskell (62) · Sublette (51) · Bienville (24) · Martin (19) · Dewey (16)

Formations: Mesaverde-Wasatch (522) · Mesaverde-Lance (161) · Anadarko Basin (132) · Trend Area (99) · Bakken (99)

Sm Energy Company

Counties: Duchesne (495) · Webb (487) · Howard (448) · Upton (410) · Martin (174)

Formations: Austin Chalk (559) · Thirty-One Carbonate-Chert (407) · Niobrara- Mowry (266) · Wolfcamp A (249) · Mesaverde-Wasatch (233)

Related Comparisons

About This Comparison