E & B Natural Resources Management vs Thums Long Beach Company

Side-by-side comparison of two oil and gas operators in CA,KS,TX,WY and CA. Drawn from public well data and state-regulator production filings.

Important — Public-Data Disclaimer. The information shown on this page is sourced exclusively from publicly available oil and gas regulatory records (Texas Railroad Commission, Oklahoma Corporation Commission, and aggregated public well data). Valor is presenting these public records side-by-side as an informational convenience only.

E & B Natural Resources Management

CA,KS,TX,WY · 4,225 wells on file

Thums Long Beach Company

CA · 2,124 wells on file

Side-by-Side Statistics

MetricE & B Natural Resources ManagementThums Long Beach Company
Total wells4,2252,124
Wells producing (any time)2,8381,606
Permits filed (last 24 months)15293
Most recent permit date2026-06-182026-06-12
Most recent spud date2024-12-202023-12-04
Average lateral length (ft)1,2871,600
Top formationSan Joaquin BasinMonterey
Top countyKernLos Angeles Offshore
States operating inCA,KS,TX,WYCA
Last-12mo oil production (BBL)1,449,3332,987,832
Last-12mo gas production (Mcf)727,9411,350,494

Shared Territory

Both operators have wells in these counties:

Los Angeles

Both operators target these formations / plays:

Monterey

Per-Operator Top Counties & Formations

E & B Natural Resources Management

Counties: Kern (3,202) · Los Angeles (372) · Santa Barbara (372) · San Luis Obispo (71) · Campbell (62)

Formations: San Joaquin Basin (1,671) · Etchegoin (648) · Monterey (392) · Santa Maria Basin (275) · Basal Etchegoin (256)

Thums Long Beach Company

Counties: Los Angeles Offshore (1,724) · Los Angeles (400)

Formations: Monterey (1,893) · Ranger (175) · Upper Terminal (30) · Lower Terminal (7) · Terminal (5)

Related Comparisons

About This Comparison