Thums Long Beach Company vs Union Pacific Resources Company

Side-by-side comparison of two oil and gas operators in CA and AL,AR,CA,CO,IL,LA,MI,MS,MT,ND,NE,OK,TX,UT,WY. Drawn from public well data and state-regulator production filings.

Important — Public-Data Disclaimer. The information shown on this page is sourced exclusively from publicly available oil and gas regulatory records (Texas Railroad Commission, Oklahoma Corporation Commission, and aggregated public well data). Valor is presenting these public records side-by-side as an informational convenience only.

Thums Long Beach Company

CA · 2,124 wells on file

Union Pacific Resources Company

AL,AR,CA,CO,IL,LA,MI,MS,MT,ND,NE,OK,TX,UT,WY · 2,464 wells on file

Side-by-Side Statistics

MetricThums Long Beach CompanyUnion Pacific Resources Company
Total wells2,1242,464
Wells producing (any time)1,606777
Permits filed (last 24 months)930
Most recent permit date2026-06-122019-02-11
Most recent spud date2023-12-042018-06-15
Average lateral length (ft)1,6002,977
Top formationMontereyMonterey
Top countyLos Angeles OffshoreLos Angeles
States operating inCAAL,AR,CA,CO,IL,LA,MI,MS,MT,ND,NE,OK,TX,UT,WY
Last-12mo oil production (BBL)2,987,83269
Last-12mo gas production (Mcf)1,350,4943,852

Shared Territory

Both operators have wells in these counties:

Los Angeles

Both operators target these formations / plays:

Monterey

Per-Operator Top Counties & Formations

Thums Long Beach Company

Counties: Los Angeles Offshore (1,724) · Los Angeles (400)

Formations: Monterey (1,893) · Ranger (175) · Upper Terminal (30) · Lower Terminal (7) · Terminal (5)

Union Pacific Resources Company

Counties: Los Angeles (950) · Burleson (129) · Sweetwater (110) · Crockett (93) · Slope (91)

Formations: Monterey (898) · Austin Chalk (513) · Red River (127) · Vicksburg (113) · Ozona Canyon (113)

Related Comparisons

About This Comparison