Greylock Production vs Qep Energy Company

Side-by-side comparison of two oil and gas operators in PA,UT,WY and AR,CO,LA,ND,NM,OK,TX,UT,WY. Drawn from public well data and state-regulator production filings.

Important — Public-Data Disclaimer. The information shown on this page is sourced exclusively from publicly available oil and gas regulatory records (Texas Railroad Commission, Oklahoma Corporation Commission, and aggregated public well data). Valor is presenting these public records side-by-side as an informational convenience only.

Greylock Production

PA,UT,WY · 1,699 wells on file

Qep Energy Company

AR,CO,LA,ND,NM,OK,TX,UT,WY · 1,698 wells on file

Side-by-Side Statistics

MetricGreylock ProductionQep Energy Company
Total wells1,6991,698
Wells producing (any time)1,550309
Permits filed (last 24 months)71
Most recent permit date2026-04-242024-07-17
Most recent spud date2025-12-152023-01-13
Average lateral length (ft)4,0762,705
Top formationMesaverde-WasatchMesaverde-Wasatch
Top countyUintahUintah
States operating inPA,UT,WYAR,CO,LA,ND,NM,OK,TX,UT,WY
Last-12mo oil production (BBL)162,1601,463
Last-12mo gas production (Mcf)42,174,816248,551

Shared Territory

Both operators have wells in these counties:

UintahSublette

Both operators target these formations / plays:

Mesaverde-Wasatch

Per-Operator Top Counties & Formations

Greylock Production

Counties: Uintah (1,469) · Greene (144) · Sublette (58) · Lincoln (11) · Potter (9)

Formations: Mesaverde-Wasatch (1,467) · Marcellus (138) · Hilliardbaxtermancos-Niobrara (40) · Mesaverde (19) · Lower Marcellus (10)

Qep Energy Company

Counties: Uintah (510) · Sublette (164) · Martin (131) · Haskell (89) · Mc Kenzie (61)

Formations: Mesaverde-Wasatch (522) · Mesaverde-Lance (161) · Anadarko Basin (132) · Trend Area (99) · Bakken (99)

Related Comparisons

About This Comparison