(817) 370-0612

Greylock Production vs Qep Energy Company

Side-by-side comparison of two oil and gas operators in PA,UT,WY and LA,OK,TX,UT,WY. Drawn from public well data and state-regulator production filings.

Important — Public-Data Disclaimer. The information shown on this page is sourced exclusively from publicly available oil and gas regulatory records (Texas Railroad Commission, Oklahoma Corporation Commission, and aggregated public well data). Valor is presenting these public records side-by-side as an informational convenience only.

Greylock Production

PA,UT,WY · 1,701 wells on file

Qep Energy Company

LA,OK,TX,UT,WY · 1,698 wells on file

Side-by-Side Statistics

MetricGreylock ProductionQep Energy Company
Total wells1,7011,698
Wells producing (any time)1,549309
Permits filed (last 24 months)110
Most recent permit date2026-09-032024-07-17
Most recent spud date2026-09-112023-01-13
Average lateral length (ft)4,7012,781
Top formationMesaverde-WasatchMesaverde-Wasatch
Top countyUintahHaskell
States operating inPA,UT,WYLA,OK,TX,UT,WY
Last-12mo oil production (BBL)148,661593
Last-12mo gas production (Mcf)40,512,51781,677

Shared Territory

Both operators have wells in these counties:

Sublette

Both operators target these formations / plays:

Mesaverde-Wasatch

Per-Operator Top Counties & Formations

Greylock Production

Counties: Uintah (1,272) · Greene (136) · Sublette (31) · Potter (12) · Lincoln (4)

Formations: Mesaverde-Wasatch (1,467) · Marcellus (138) · Hilliardbaxtermancos-Niobrara (40) · Mesaverde (18) · Utica Shale (11)

Qep Energy Company

Counties: Haskell (62) · Sublette (51) · Bienville (24) · Martin (19) · Dewey (16)

Formations: Mesaverde-Wasatch (522) · Mesaverde-Lance (161) · Anadarko Basin (132) · Bakken (99) · Trend Area (99)

Related Comparisons

About This Comparison