Tidelands Oil Production Company vs Union Pacific Resources Company

Side-by-side comparison of two oil and gas operators in CA,TX and AL,AR,CA,CO,IL,LA,MI,MS,MT,ND,NE,OK,TX,UT,WY. Drawn from public well data and state-regulator production filings.

Important — Public-Data Disclaimer. The information shown on this page is sourced exclusively from publicly available oil and gas regulatory records (Texas Railroad Commission, Oklahoma Corporation Commission, and aggregated public well data). Valor is presenting these public records side-by-side as an informational convenience only.

Tidelands Oil Production Company

CA,TX · 4,177 wells on file

Union Pacific Resources Company

AL,AR,CA,CO,IL,LA,MI,MS,MT,ND,NE,OK,TX,UT,WY · 2,464 wells on file

Side-by-Side Statistics

MetricTidelands Oil Production CompanyUnion Pacific Resources Company
Total wells4,1772,464
Wells producing (any time)1,653777
Permits filed (last 24 months)710
Most recent permit date2026-07-082019-02-11
Most recent spud date2022-09-302018-06-15
Average lateral length (ft)7552,977
Top formationMontereyMonterey
Top countyLos AngelesLos Angeles
States operating inCA,TXAL,AR,CA,CO,IL,LA,MI,MS,MT,ND,NE,OK,TX,UT,WY
Last-12mo oil production (BBL)1,696,95069
Last-12mo gas production (Mcf)459,1723,852

Shared Territory

Both operators have wells in these counties:

Los Angeles

Both operators target these formations / plays:

Monterey

Per-Operator Top Counties & Formations

Tidelands Oil Production Company

Counties: Los Angeles (2,699) · Los Angeles Offshore (1,473) · Frio (2) · Starr (1) · Maverick (1)

Formations: Monterey (3,825) · Ranger (106) · Tar (75) · Upper Terminal (63) · Lower Terminal (21)

Union Pacific Resources Company

Counties: Los Angeles (950) · Burleson (129) · Sweetwater (110) · Crockett (93) · Slope (91)

Formations: Monterey (898) · Austin Chalk (513) · Red River (127) · Vicksburg (113) · Ozona Canyon (113)

Related Comparisons

About This Comparison