(817) 370-0612

Anschutz Exploration vs Yates Petroleum

Side-by-side comparison of two oil and gas operators in CO,ND,UT,WY and WY. Drawn from public well data and state-regulator production filings.

Important — Public-Data Disclaimer. The information shown on this page is sourced exclusively from publicly available oil and gas regulatory records (Texas Railroad Commission, Oklahoma Corporation Commission, and aggregated public well data). Valor is presenting these public records side-by-side as an informational convenience only.

Anschutz Exploration

CO,ND,UT,WY · 6,597 wells on file

Yates Petroleum

WY · 3,044 wells on file

Side-by-Side Statistics

MetricAnschutz ExplorationYates Petroleum
Total wells6,5973,044
Wells producing (any time)5281,618
Permits filed (last 24 months)3540
Most recent permit date2026-10-012020-10-14
Most recent spud date2026-09-282015-10-09
Average lateral length (ft)6,0921,149
Top formationNiobrara- MowryNiobrara- Mowry
Top countyCampbellCampbell
States operating inCO,ND,UT,WYWY
Last-12mo oil production (BBL)9,728,7430
Last-12mo gas production (Mcf)38,306,5450

Shared Territory

Both operators have wells in these counties:

CampbellJohnsonConverse

Both operators target these formations / plays:

Niobrara- MowryPowder River Basin

Per-Operator Top Counties & Formations

Anschutz Exploration

Counties: Campbell (1,342) · Johnson (1,006) · Converse (558) · Uintah (163) · Rio Blanco (23)

Formations: Niobrara- Mowry (1,636) · Powder River Basin (1,307) · Niobrara (651) · Mowry (624) · Sussex (403)

Yates Petroleum

Counties: Campbell (1,388) · Johnson (129) · Converse (21) · Sweetwater (20) · Sheridan (13)

Formations: Niobrara- Mowry (1,572) · Niobrara (276) · Powder River Basin (211) · Mesaverde-Lance-Lewis (196) · Wallcanyon Lcanyon Uanderson (115)

Related Comparisons

About This Comparison